Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Ojo v. Medic, et al
as 13-1650
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSUYUWAMEN OJO
Defendant - Appellee:
ELDIN MEDIC, a/k/a FNU Medic, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES O'MARA and others
Ojo v. Medic, et al
as 13-1649
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSUYUWAMEN OJO
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES O'MARA, ELDIN MEDIC, a/k/a FNU Medic, JUSTIN GOULDING, a/k/a Goulding and others
Kargbo v. Hillsborough County DOC, et al
as 12-1803
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABU B. KARGBO
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES O'MARA, JR., Superintendent, Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, CARL BROWN, JONATHAN PLUMPTON and others
Defendant:
OFFICER MEURIN
Gordon v. Wall
as 1:2011cv00662
Petitioner:
David N. Gordon, Jr.
Defendant:
A. T. Wall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dean v. Roden
as 11-1788
Petitioner - Appellant:
GORDON J. DEAN, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
GARY RODEN, Superintendent, MCI Norfolk
WHITE v. SWARTZ et al
as 2:2011cv00224
Plaintiff:
DONALD WHITE, I
Defendant:
BARBARA SWARTZ, HANNA MONACO, GORDON WERTHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Podkulski v. Doe et al
as 1:2011cv00102
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Podkulski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCLAUGHLIN v. PENOBSCOT COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2010cv00217
Plaintiff:
GORDON B MCLAUGHLIN
Defendant:
PENOBSCOT COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SHERIFF, PENOBSCOT COUNTY, NUTTALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean v. Roden
as 1:2010cv10807
Petitioner:
Gordon J. Dean, Jr.
Respondent:
Gary Roden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fleming v. Correctional Medical Services, et al
as 09-1532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GORDON FLEMING
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY OLATUNJI, in his personal and professional capacity as a Dentist, TERESA KESTALOOT, in her personal and professional capacity, EDIE WOODWARD, in her personal and professional capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
