Cases 31 - 40 of 586
Winkleman v. Hazlewood
as 23-1942
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN F. WINKLEMAN, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT HAZLEWOOD, Warden, FCI Berlin
Duarte v. Commonwealth et al
as 1:2023cv12678
Plaintiff:
Eric J Duarte
Defendant:
Commonwealth, Norfolk County, Sheriff Patrick W McDermott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latham v. Demissie, et al
as 23-1904
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINCOLN LATHAM, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DEREGE B. DEMISSIE, Lawyer Register at Board of Bar Overseer, BEANIE SIGEL, Singer at Rocafella Records in New York, LUTHER WALLIS, Correctional Officer & Prison Guard and others
Olivier v. Dept of Corrections
as 1:2023cv12582
Petitioner:
Herve Olivier, Jr
Respondent:
Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beamud v. USA
as 1:2023cv00502
Petitioner:
Rafael Beamud, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bronson v. US
as 23-1796
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH NEIL BRONSON, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Latham v. Mici
as 23-1814
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINCOLN LATHAM, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CAROL A. MICI
Gonzalez v. Salisbury
as 23-1821
Petitioner / Appellant:
TONY G. GONZALEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR.
Stroman v. Bristol County District Attorney's Office, et al
as 23-1806
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EVANS EMONS STROMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
BRISTOL COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, BRISTOL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, NEW BEDFORD DISTRICT COURT and others
Callahan et al v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
Ryan Grant Callahan and Michael Angelo Ranucci Jr.
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Corrections and Adult Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
