Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Jackson v. Worcester Police Department et al
as 4:2010cv40138
Plaintiff:
Shane Jackson
Defendant:
Worcester Police Department, Thomas B Duffy, Gerald Montiverdi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chase v. RI Department of Corrections, et al
as 10-1175
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BOTELHO, MICHAEL A. BRENNAN, ALFRED BRISSETTE and others
Movant - Appellant:
PARRISH CHASE
Defendant - Appellee:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF RHODE ISLAND
Interested Party:
MICHAEL RICHARDSON, THOMAS WEBB, KENNETH WILSON and others
Nascimento v. US
as 09-2416
Petitioner - Appellant:
JACKSON NASCIMENTO
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Moore v. Weeden et al
as 1:2009cv00434
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L. Moore
Defendant:
James Weeden, Nancy Bailey, Michele Auger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Dickhaut
as 1:2009cv11415
Plaintiff:
David Jackson
Defendant:
Thomas Dickhaut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Russo
as 09-1170
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEONARD JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
LOIS RUSSO
Stote, et al v. Maloney, et al
as 08-2205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. STOTE, FRANCIS HANNON, SEAN MILLIKEN and others
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE M. MCARTHUR, WAYNE D. CROSBY, STEVEN BALSAVICH and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL T. MALONEY, PETER ALLEN, GARY FYFE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GERI CRISMAN, GURVINDER KAUR JAISWAL and U MASS CORRECTIONAL HEALTH UNIT
Nascimento v. USA
as 1:2008cv10993
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jackson Nascimento
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jackson v. Spencer
as 08-1600
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANA JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
LUIS SPENCER, Superintendent, MCI - Norfolk
Jackson v. Spencer
as 1:2007cv11272
Petitioner:
Dana Jackson
Respondent:
Luis Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
