Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Gamble Williams v. Boston Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv10701
Plaintiff:
Theodore Gamble Williams
Defendant:
Boston Police Department, Boston Police Officer John Doe and Boston Police Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinney v. Police of La Salle Illinois, et al
as 24-1035
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN PINNEY, a/k/a Gitapushy Val Angel
Defendant:
LASALLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, LASALLE COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, LASALLE COUNTY COURT and others
Macdonald v. Brighton Police Chief et al
as 1:2023cv10020
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Brighton Police Chief, Brighton Police Officers 1-25 John Does, Brighton Supervising Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Boston Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv11009
Plaintiff:
Lynnel Cox
Defendant:
Boston Police Department, Ismael Almeida, Paul Michael Bertocchi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McClinton v. Boston Police Department
as 1:2019cv11406
Defendant:
Boston Police Department
Plaintiff:
Shawn T. McClinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClinton v. Boston Police Department
as 1:2019cv11235
Defendant:
Boston Police Department
Plaintiff:
Shawn T. McClinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Commonwealth of MA, et al
as 17-1323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DON EARL JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY BOARD and BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
US v. McGregor
as 17-1142
Petitioner - Appellant:
MELVIN MCGREGOR
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Spencer v. Lewis, et al
as 16-2266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY H. SPENCER, II
Defendant - Appellee:
RODERICK LEWIS, also known as Mr. Lewis, BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, PETER KING and others
Curry v. Martin et al
as 1:2015cv14116
Plaintiff:
William Curry
Defendant:
Ralph Martin, Tracy Lee-Lyons, Marie Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
