Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Cintron v. Bibeault, et al
as 22-1716
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JERRY CINTRON
Defendant / Appellant:
PAUL BIBEAULT, In his Official and Individual Capacity, RUI DINIZ, in his official and individual capacity, MATTHEW KETTLE, in his official and individual capacity and others
Defendant:
LT. HAYES, in his official and individual capacity, LT. MOE, in his official and individual capacity, LT. BUSH, in his official and individual capacity and others
Ortiz-Cintron v. USA
as 3:2022cv01329
Petitioner:
Roberto Ortiz-Cintron
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cintron v. Bibeault et al
as 1:2019cv00497
Defendant:
Paul Bibeault, Special Investigator Cabral, Jennifer Chapman and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Cintron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contreras v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2018cv01944
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and Maria Lugardo-Cintron
Plaintiff:
Manuel Contreras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morales-Cintron v. USA
as 3:2017cv02157
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kelvin D. Morales-Cintron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Contreras v. Lugardo-Cintron et al
as 3:2017cv01466
Petitioner:
Manuel Contreras
Respondent:
Maria Lugardo-Cintron and Wanda Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cintron-Caraballo v. US
as 16-1255
Petitioner - Appellant:
JUAN ENRIQUE CINTRON-CARABALLO
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Perez-Marquez v. Departamento de Correccion et al
as 3:2015cv02876
Plaintiff:
Willie Perez-Marquez
Defendant:
Departamento de Correccion de Puerto Rico, Jose Aponte-Caro, Nicanor Caro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cintron v. USA
as 1:2015cv11868
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Manuel Cintron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Arias v. US
as 15-1500
Petitioner - Appellant:
ESTHER ANGELICA ARIAS, a/k/a Jannette Cintron, a/k/a Gleiry Lopez, a/k/a Angelica Arias
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
