Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Ellis v. FCI Berlin
as 1:2023cv00561
Petitioner:
Joshua Ellis
Respondent:
FCI Berlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
NISBET v. ELLIS et al
as 1:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA R NISBET and JOSHUA LIBBY
Defendant:
ROB ELLIS, STEVE WEBSTER, CHRIS TODD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HART v. STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES HART
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT, NICHOLAS GAGNON and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brayman v. Maguire
as 22-1299
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WADE DREW BRAYMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SEAN MAGUIRE and GREGG ELLIS
Defendant:
RAYMOND PORTER, GARY CRAFTS and GREG ELLIS
Lard Sr. v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv10087
Petitioner:
Ellis Jerome Lard Sr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lard v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv11511
Petitioner:
Ellis J Lard
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lard v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv10936
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
Ellis Lard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lard v. USDFA et al
as 1:2021cv10642
Respondent:
USDFA, A. Boncher and Attorney General
Petitioner:
Ellis Lard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRAYMAN v. PORTER et al
as 1:2020cv00169
Defendant:
CAPTAIN SEAN MAGUIRE, CAPTAIN GARY CRAFTS, MAJOR RAYMOND PORTER and others
Plaintiff:
WADE DREW BRAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lard Sr. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv11613
Petitioner:
Ellis Jerome Lard Sr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
