Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Latham v. Johnson
as 24-1538
Plaintiff:
LINCOLN LATHAM, JR., Student of Interplay HVAC Fundamentals
Defendant:
LAUREN JOHNSON, Treasurer - Inmate Account Office at Old Colony Correctional Center
Latham v. Officer Oneill et al
as 1:2024cv11318
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Latham
Defendant:
Officer Oneill and Legal Mail Officer at Old Colony Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Latham v. Officer Wyatt et al
as 1:2024cv11310
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Latham
Defendant:
Officer Wyatt and Inmate Canteen Office at Old Colony Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yahtues v. Kennedy, et al
as 24-1429
Petitioner:
MALACHI I. YAHTUES
Respondent:
STEPHEN KENNEDY, Superintendent, Old Colony Correctional Center and STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Yahtues v. Old Colony Correctional Center, Superintendent
as 1:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Malachi I. Yahtues
Respondent:
Stephen Kennedy and Old Colony Correctional Center, Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1704
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rios v. Old Colony Correctional Center (OCCC) et al
as 1:2023cv11538
Plaintiff:
Ray Luis Rios
Defendant:
Old Colony Correctional Center (OCCC) and Charleston A. Stevenson
Consolidated Defendant:
Anthony Stevenson, Dean Grey and Michael Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1524
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1363
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
