Labor Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Valentin et al v. BCPeabody Construction Services LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv01282
Plaintiff: MANUEL NAZARIO, ROBERTO DIEPPA, JOSE LLANOS and others
Defendant: BCPeabody Construction Services LLC, John Doe and Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Parker v. Denny's Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv10886
Defendant: Denny's Inc. and Doe Defendants 1-10
Plaintiff: Jillian Parker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Vazquez-Ortiz v. One to Seven, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01463
Defendant: Tomas Padilla, One to Seven, Inc., Defendants DEF and others
Plaintiff: Jovelisse Vazquez-Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chase v. United States Postal Service, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1351
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT CHASE
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, MICHEAL KING and UNITED STATES, as sole defendant on Counts III, IV, and V.
O'Shea et al v. UPS Retirement Plan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv10377
Plaintiff: Brian O'Shea and Michael O'Shea
Defendant: Doe Defendants 1, 2 and 3, UPS Retirement Plan, United Parcel Service of America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Drexler v. TEL NEXX, INC., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv13009
Plaintiff: Joshua Drexler
Defendant: TELL NEXX, INC , Tokyo Electron U.S. Holdings, Inc., Tokyo Electron America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Polanco-Bezares et al v. Fiddler Gonzlez & Rodrguez, P.S.C. et al
as 3:2012cv01604
Plaintiff: Pedro J. Polanco-Bezares , Sylvia Pagn-Casaas and Conjugal Partnership Polanco-Pagn
Defendant: Fiddler Gonzlez & Rodrguez, P.S.C. , The Fiddler Gonzlez & Rodrguez Profit And Revenue Partnership and John, Jane, Dick And Other Unidentified Defendants
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Perez et al v. Prime Steak House Restaurant Corp. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv01248
Plaintiff: Moises Perez and Alejandro Velez-Cespon
Defendant: Prime Steak House Restaurant Corp. and Unknown Defendants A, B, C
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bunch, et al v. W.R. Grace & Co.,, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1406
Plaintiff - Appellant: LAWRENCE BUNCH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and on behalf of the W.R. Grace & Co. Savings and Investment Plan, JERRY L. HOWARD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and on behalf of the W.R. Grace & Co. Savings and Investment Plan and DAVID MUELLER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and on behalf of the W.R. Grace & Co. Employee Savings and Investment Plan and the Grace Stock Fund
Plaintiff: KERI EVANS, on behalf of herself and a class of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: W.R. GRACE & CO.,, W. R. GRACE & CO. - CONN., ROBERT M. TAROLA and others
Defendant: FIDELITY MANAGEMENT, BRENDA GOTTLIEB, W. BRIAN MCGOWAN and others
Evans, et al v. Akers, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1140
Plaintiff - Appellant: KERI EVANS, on behalf of herself and a class of all others similarly situated and TIMOTHY WHIPPS, on behalf of himself and a class of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff: LAWRENCE BUNCH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and on behalf of the W.R. Grace & Co. Employee, JERRY L. HOWARD and DAVID MUELLER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and on behalf of the W.R. Grace & Co. Employee Savings and Investment Plan and the Grace Stock Fund
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN F. AKERS, RONALD C. CAMBRE, MARYE ANNE FOX and others
Defendant: FIDELITY MANAGEMENT, STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, STATE STREET GLOBAL ADVISORS and others
:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?