Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Cote v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2024cv00075
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island, Chief Justice Paul A. Suttell, in his official capacity, Julie Hamel, in her Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas R. Cote
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Teamsters Local 251 Health Services and Insurance Plan v. Adamsdale Concrete, Inc
as 1:2019cv00042
Plaintiff:
Teamsters Local 251 Health Services and Insurance Plan, by and through Tammy Beaudreault, in her capacity as Fund Administrator and Teamsters Local 251 Health Services and Insurance Plan
Defendant:
Adamsdale Concrete, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Healey v. CSX Transportation, Inc., et al
as 16-2171
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS INC, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d/b/a Amtrak and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MAURA T. HEALEY, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
Intervenor:
TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, MECHANICAL DIVISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN and others
CSX Transportation, Inc., et al v. Brotherhood of Locomotive, et al
as 16-2172
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS INC, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d/b/a Amtrak and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MAURA T. HEALEY, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Defendant - Appellant:
BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION/IBT, TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
Germanowski v. Harris, et al
as 16-1306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HEIDI GERMANOWSKI
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA HARRIS, individually and in her capacity as Register of Deeds and COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Perez v. Herring
as 1:2015cv10034
Defendant:
Richard Curtis Herring
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Maine Education Association Be, et al v. Cioppa
as 12-1199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAINE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION BENEFITS TRUST, ROGER YOUNG, in his capacity as Trustee of the Maine Education Association Benefits Trust, SUSAN GRONDIN, in her capacity as Trustee of the Maine Education Association Benefits Trust and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC CIOPPA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of Insurance for the State of Maine
Interested Party:
MAINE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT 60, AUGUSTA SCHOOL DEPARTMENT, MAINE SCHOOL BOARD ASSOCIATION and others
Bergemann, et al v. Rhode Island Department of Env, et al
as 11-1484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT BERGEMANN, DEAN LEES, MICHAEL LONGTIN and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS FLOOR, JOSEPH POCCIA, MARK SAUNDERS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT and GINA M. RAIMONDO, in her capacity as Treasurer of the State of Rhode Island
Bergemann, et al v. Rhode Island Department of Env, et al
as 11-1407
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT BERGEMANN, DEAN LEES, MICHAEL LONGTIN and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS FLOOR, JOSEPH POCCIA, MARK SAUNDERS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT and GINA M. RAIMONDO, in her capacity as Treasurer of the State of Rhode Island
Defendant:
FRANK CAPRIO, in his official capacity as Treasurer of the State of Rhode Island
Diaz-Bigio v. Santini, et al
as 09-2575
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARIA S. DIAZ-BIGIO
Defendant - Appellant:
ALFREDO ESCALERA, MARITZA AGUILAR-JUSINO, in her official and personal capacity, JORGE COLOMER-MONTES, in his official and personal capacity and others
Defendant:
MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
