Cases 91 - 100 of 118
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv11527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Berry v. Spencer, et al
as 09-2050
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERMAINE BERRY
Respondent - Appellee:
LUIS SPENCER, Superintendent and MARTHA COAKLEY, Attorney General
Ferent v. US, et al
as 09-1971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALPHONSE R. FERENT
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, WILLIAM G. YOUNG, GEORGE A. O'TOOLE and others
Wade v. Brady, et al
as 09-1818
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT WADE
Defendant - Appellant:
TIMOTHY J. CRUZ, MARTHA COAKLEY, Attorney General and BERNARD F. BRADY, Acting Superintendent
Respondent:
THOMAS REILLY
Jones v. O'Brien et al
as 1:2009cv10919
Petitioner:
Jerone Jones
Respondent:
Steven O'Brien and Martha Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tash v. Roden, et al
as 3:2009cv30042
Petitioner:
Dewitt Tash
Respondent:
Gary Roden and Martha Coakley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ferent v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv10386
Plaintiff:
Alphonse R. Ferent, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Douglas P. Woodlock, William G. Young and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Baggett et al v. Murphy et al
as 4:2008cv40224
Plaintiff:
Michael Baggett
Defendant:
Carolyn Murphy, Deval L. Patrick, Timothy P. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Azubuko v. Doherty et al
as 1:2008cv11784
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
Defendant:
Michael Doherty, Paul Burns, Stephen S. Abany and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McCullen, et al v. Coakley
as 08-2310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELEANOR MCCULLEN, JEAN BLACKBURN ZARRELLA, CARMEL FARRELL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTHA COAKLEY, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
:
, , and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
