Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Phelps v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv10331
Plaintiff: Coy Phelps
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coy v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv11199
Plaintiff: Patricia A. Coy
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Coy
as 11-1978
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: CHASITY COY
Phelps v. Grondolsky et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv11032
Plaintiff: Coy Phelps
Defendant: Jeffrey Grondolsky, Walter Johnson and Ivonne Benet-Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Phelps v. Grondolsky
as 1:2011cv10231
Plaintiff: Coy Phelps
Defendant: Jeffery Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Phelps v. Grondolsky We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv10083
Petitioner: Coy Phelps
Respondent: Jeffery Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Phelps v. Local 0222
as 10-2124
Plaintiff - Appellant: COY PHELPS
Defendant - Appellee: LOCAL 0222, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES AFI-CIO, ATS CORPORATION, (Trulinks/Trufone) and others
Phelps v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv11591
Plaintiff: Coy Phelps
Defendant: United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Luis Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Phelps v. Jones et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv40127
Plaintiff: Coy Phelps
Defendant: Ruth Jones and William Suter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Phelps v. O'Toole, et al
as 10-1516
Plaintiff - Appellant: COY PHELPS
Defendant - Appellee: GEORGE A. O'TOOLE, United States District Court Judge, MARILYN H. PATEL, United States District Court Judge and OTHERS UNNAMED

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?