Cases 11 - 20 of 164
Nat'l Trust for Historic Pres. in the US, et al v. Buttigieg, et al
as 23-1630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION, FRIENDS OF THE FRANK J. WOOD BRIDGE, HISTORIC BRIDGE FOUNDATION and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PETER PAUL MONTGOMERY BUTTIGIEG, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation, TODD JORGENSEN, in his official capacity as Administrator, Federal Highway Administration Maine Division, BRUCE VAN NOTE, in his official capacity as Commissioner, Maine Department of Transportation and others
Carson, et al v. Makin
as 23-1436
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID CARSON, as parent and next friend of O.C., AMY CARSON, as parent and next friend of O.C., ALAN GILLIS, as parent and next friend of I.G. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
A. PENDER MAKIN, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Department of Education
Interested Party:
AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MAINE and others
C. F. v. Scolaro, et al
as 23-1220
Plaintiff / Appellant:
C. F., as a Parent and Next Friend to M.F.
Defendant / Appellee:
AMY SCOLARO, individually and in her capacity as Director of Special Education for Marshfield Public Schools, ERIN WIGGIN, individually and in her capacity as Special Education Department Head for Marshfield High School, JEFFREY GRANATINO, individually and in his capacity as Superintendent of Marshfield Public Schools and others
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES et al v. BUTTIGIEG et al
as 2:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES, FRIENDS OF THE FRANK J WOOD BRIDGE, HISTORIC BRIDGE FOUNDATION and others
Defendant:
PETE BUTTIGIEG, SHAILEN BHATT, TODD JORGENSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Foote, et al v. Ludlow School Committee, et al
as 23-1069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN FOOTE, MARISSA SILVESTRI, STEPHEN FOOTE, individually and as Guardian and next friend of B.F. and G.F., minors and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN FELICIANO and SANDRA SALMERON
Defendant / Appellee:
LUDLOW SCHOOL COMMITTEE, TODD GAZDA, former Superintendent, LISA NEMETH, interim Superintendent and others
Interested Party:
GLBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS, MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENTS and FAMILY INSTITUTE OF CONNECTICUT
Doe v. Spears, et al
as 22-1855
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE, Father and Next Friend of Minors A,B, and C
Defendant / Appellee:
LINDA S. SPEARS, Commissioner of Massachusetts Department of Children, Individually, PATRICIA KELLY, as a State Employee and Individually, JUDITH EDWARDS, as a State Employee and Individually and others
M.L. v. Concord School District, et al
as 22-1830
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M.L., a minor, by and through her father and next friend, D.L.
Defendant / Appellee:
CONCORD SCHOOL DISTRICT, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT 8, TERRI FORSTEN, Superintendent of Concord School District, in her individual and official capacity and others
Jones, et al v. Massachusetts Interscholastic Athletic Association
as 22-1784
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SARAH JONES, as guardian, parent and next friend of her minor child "Jimmy," on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and JOHN SMITH AND JANE SMITH, as guardians, parents and next friends of their minor child "Timmy," on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
MASSACHUSETTS INTERSCHOLASTIC ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1744
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv11701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
