Cases 11 - 20 of 67
Santiago-Borrero v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv01428
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Santiago-Borrero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Roman Tirado et al v. Hospital San Carlos, Inc. d/b/a Hospital San Carlos Borromeo et al
as 3:2019cv01249
Plaintiff:
Marvin Roman Tirado and ANA VALENTIN
Defendant:
Hospital San Carlos, Inc. d/b/a Hospital San Carlos Borromeo, CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP COMPOSED BY MIRELIS MIRANDA GALLOZA AND HER HUSBAND, INSURANCE COMPANY C, D, E AND F and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Santiago-Diaz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv01139
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Santiago Diaz and Jose Manuel Santiago-Diaz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Santiago v. US
as 19-1116
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE ALIBAL SANTIAGO
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
US v. Santiago-Gonzalez
as 19-1015
Interested Party:
BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE RAMON SANTIAGO-GONZALEZ
Lugo et al v. Country Fresh Carolinas LLC
as 3:2018cv01512
Plaintiff:
Mr Giovanny J Lugo, Edward Quinonez-Guzman, Jose A Santiago-Lugo and others
Defendant:
Country Fresh Carolinas LLC and Country Fresh Carolina LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company v. Santiago-Rodriguez
as 3:2018cv01380
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company
Defendant:
Jose Alberto Santiago-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Santiago-Rodriguez v. USA
as 3:2017cv01874
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Raul Santiago-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
