Cases 11 - 20 of 1,614
Dooley v. Sullivan County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Kevin P. Dooley
Defendant:
Sullivan County (Department of Corrections), Stanley Hannum, Christopher M. McBeigh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Bangor Savings Bank, et al
as 24-1445
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS and BRIENNA ROWE
Defendant:
BANGOR SAVINGS BANK, TRESTEN BERGERON, Branch Manager of Skowhegan Branch and GABRIELLE CAMPBELL, Assistant Branch Manager of Skowhegan Branch
Seguin v. Rhode Island Office of Child Support Services, et al
as 24-1451
Plaintiff:
MARY SEGUIN
Defendant:
RHODE ISLAND OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, in its official capacity, KEVIN TIGHE, in his individual and official capacity, MONIQUE BONIN, in her individual and official capacity and others
Harding v. Amazon.com et al
as 1:2024cv10978
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harding
Defendant:
Amazon.com and Jeff Bezos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harding v. Google, Inc.
as 1:2024cv10991
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harding
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harding v. SpaceX et al
as 1:2024cv10977
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harding
Defendant:
SpaceX and Elon Musk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harding v. Costco
as 1:2024cv10981
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harding
Defendant:
Costco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
US v. Perry
as 24-1437
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
KEVIN A. PERRY, JR.
Interested Party:
CORNERSTONE BANK, EAGLE ACORN ACRES, LLC, BAY STATE SAVINGS BANK and others
Ross v. Pike, et al
as 24-1249
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
PIKE, Administrator at Somerset County Jail, D. GRAY, JAQUES, Sargent at Somerset County Jail and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
