Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Kong v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv10119
Plaintiff:
Bunthoeun Kong
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Snell v. Neville, et al
as 19-2018
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICIA RUZE, MONSERRATE QUINONES, STEPHANIE Y. COLLINS and others
Defendant:
THOMAS DEMOURA, THERESA SMITH, CLESELY M. GARCIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMORY G. SNELL, JR.
Guan et al v. Hot Pot Boston 1 LLC et al
as 1:2018cv12265
Plaintiff:
Xiuli Zheng, Zilin Wu, Ze Wang and others
Defendant:
Kong Wai William Cheung, Michael Puileung Luk, Jinling "Elaine" Huang and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10901
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Huot et al v. City of Lowell et al
as 1:2017cv10895
Plaintiff:
Chanmony Huot , Vladimir Saldana , Champa Pang and others
Defendant:
City of Lowell, Kevin J. Murphy, Lowell City Council and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv10571
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv12599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv13894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Seams v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
as 1:2014cv13301
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Seams
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Correction, Raymond Marchilli, Phillip Kong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rissman, Hendricks & Oliverio LLP v. MIV Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv11747
Plaintiff:
Rissman, Hendricks & Oliverio LLP
Defendant:
MIV Therapeutics, Inc., Biosync Scientific PVT Ltd., Purple Medical Solutions PVT Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
