Cases 11 - 15 of 15
DOE et al v. AUSTIN et al
as 2:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE and JOHN DOE
Defendant:
LLOYD J AUSTIN, III, US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, US DEFENSE HEALTH AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SEAFREEZE SHORESIDE, INC. et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2022cv11091
Plaintiff:
SEAFREEZE SHORESIDE, INC., LONG ISLAND COMMERCIAL FISHING ASSOC., INC., XIII NORTHEAST FISHERY SECTOR, INC. and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, DEB HAALAND, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Vineyard Wind 1 LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Maxwell v. Austin, et al
as 21-1256
Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, ROBERT J. FENTON, JR., in his official capacity as Acting Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency and LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY MAXWELL
Emhart Industries, et al v. CNA Holdings LLC, et al
as 19-1563
3Rd Party Defendant:
ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, UNILEVER, BNS LLC and others
Defendant:
NEW ENGLAND CONTAINER COMPANY INC, ROBERT M. GATES, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Defense, MICHAEL B. DONLEY, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Air Force and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EMHART INDUSTRIES, INC. and STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, by and through the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management
Defendant / Appellee:
US NAVY, US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES and others
Interested Party:
DOW INC., f/k/a Dow Chemical Company, RHODES TECHNOLOGIES INC and WIN NOREN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
