Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv12044
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Zong et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv11380
Plaintiff: Wei Zong, Sheng Chang and Yueqin Zheng
Defendant: United States of America, National Visa Center, U.S. Department of State and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10825
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00481
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Chiang v. Skeirik, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-2105
Plaintiff - Appellant: WEN Y. CHIANG
Defendant - Appellee: LYNN SKYREICH, in her official capacity as Director of the National Visa Center, CONDOLEEZZA RICE, in her official capacity as Secretary of State, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Chiang v. Skeirik, et al
as 08-1909
Plaintiff - Appellant: WEN Y. CHIANG
Defendant - Appellee: LYNN SKYREICH, in her official capacity as Director of the National Visa Center, CONDOLEEZZA RICE, in her official capacity as Secretary of State, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Singh v. US Department of State, Secretary, et al
as 1:2008cv00149
Plaintiff: Harmanpreet Singh and Harmanpreet Singh
Defendant: US Department of State, Secretary, National Visa Center, Director, US Department of Homeland Security, Secretary and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?