Cases 11 - 20 of 226
JOHNSON v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W JOHNSON
Defendant:
DONALD J TRUMP, FACEBOOK, META and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WITHAM v. HANCOCK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY ALAN WITHAM, JR
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY JAIL and SCOTT KANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JORGENSEN v. JORGENSEN et al
as 2:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
JOHN SCOTT JORGENSEN
Defendant:
PETER JORGENSEN and KATHY JORGENSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
JORDAN v. KANE
as 1:2023cv00311
Petitioner:
MARK R JORDAN
Respondent:
SCOTT KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CANTRELL v. BRUNSWICK MAINE POLICE et al
as 2:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
BRICE CANTRELL
Defendant:
BRUNSWICK MAINE POLICE, TOWN OF BRUNSWICK, SCOTT STEWART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GALLANT v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
SCOTT GALLANT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
JORGENSEN v. JORGENSEN et al
as 2:2022cv00397
Defendant:
KATHY JORGENSEN, PETER JORGENSEN, ANNE KATHERINE JORGENSEN and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN SCOTT JORGENSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
SCOTT v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC
as 2:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
VON SCOTT
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
SCOTT v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA
as 2:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
VON SCOTT
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA
Intervenor Defendant:
WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
