Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Tandem Technologies, LLC v. Fastcorp 3, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv30105
Plaintiff:
Tandem Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Fastcorp 3, LLC, Chapco, Inc., Robert Weinstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Asaridis et al v. Weinstein et al
as 1:2014cv10417
Plaintiff:
Despina Asaridis and Ioannis Asaridis
Defendant:
Eric M. Weinstein, Tailored Tax Center, Efficient Excavating, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Asaridis et al v. Weinstein et al
as 1:2013cv13226
Plaintiff:
Despina Asaridis and Ioannis Asaridis
Defendant:
Eric M. Weinstein , Timothy Picket, Cindy Picket and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Hankey v. Town of Concord-Carlisle et al
as 1:2013cv11870
Defendant:
Town of Concord-Carlisle , Concord-Carlisle School District , Diana Rigby and others
Plaintiff:
Isabella Hankey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Weinstein v. New England Compounding Pharmacy, et al
as 1:2012cv12103
Defendant:
New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc., Ameridose, LLC, Medical Sales Management, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Weinstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Eldridge, et al v. Gordon Brother Group, LLC, et al
as 12-2311
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID KAY ELDRIDGE, RAY ELDRIDGE, JR., D. CHRIS ELDRIDGE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GORDON BROTHER GROUP, LLC, WILLIAM WEINSTEIN and FRANK MORTON
Pires-Weinstein v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv11863
Plaintiff:
Bryanna Pires-Weinstein
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Weinstein-Bacal v. Wendt-Hughes et al
as 3:2010cv01750
Plaintiff:
Stuart A. Weinstein-Bacal
Defendant:
Frederick Wendt-Hughes, Alice Wendt, La Julia Development and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Weinstein
as 1:2009mc10132
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Paul Weinstein
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
