Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Amos v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv14562
Plaintiff:
Johnny Amos
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. , Fresenius Medical Care North America Inc. , Fresenius U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor et al v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv13752
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Taylor , Christopher Gavazzi , Cheryl Shelton and others
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care North America Inc., Fresenius U.S.A., Inc. , FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MICHAUD et al v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 2:2014cv00221
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAUD and AMOS JOHNSON
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL, KEVIN JOYCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amos v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv10816
Plaintiff:
Kimerletha Amos
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MANAGEMENT SE., FRESENIUS SE & CO. KGaA., Fresenius USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamrick v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv12730
Plaintiff:
Amos Hamrick
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Doe Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Owusu-Amo v. Manchester Planning Board
as 1:2011cv00313
Defendant:
Manchester Planning Board
Plaintiff:
Benfred Owusu-Amo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quiones
as 3:2010cv01723
Plaintiff:
Vicente Amos Quiones
Receiver:
FDIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv10907
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Aderman et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01041
Plaintiff:
Thomas Aderman, Carlos Alias, Robert Bell and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
