Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00624
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Neustadter v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
as 1:2016cv12306
Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
Plaintiff: Jane Levy Neustadter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Healey v. CSX Transportation, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2171
Plaintiff - Appellee: CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS INC, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d/b/a Amtrak and others
Defendant - Appellant: MAURA T. HEALEY, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Interested Party: UNITED STATES
Intervenor: TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, MECHANICAL DIVISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN and others
CSX Transportation, Inc., et al v. Brotherhood of Locomotive, et al
as 16-2172
Plaintiff - Appellee: CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS INC, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d/b/a Amtrak and others
Defendant - Appellee: MAURA T. HEALEY, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Defendant - Appellant: BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION/IBT, TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS and others
Interested Party: UNITED STATES
Barca v. CSX Railroad et al
as 4:2016cv40131
Plaintiff: Anthony Barca
Defendant: CSX Railroad, Amtrak, The State of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Page v. Amtrak, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1325
Plaintiff - Appellant: VALERIE PAGE, as personal representative of Sean Page
Defendant - Appellee: AMTRAK
Defendant: BIDDEFORD, ME
Jackson v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
as 1:2016cv10025
Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
Plaintiff: Betty Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jenkins, et al v. Gangi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1048
Plaintiff: PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC, AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD. and others
Interested Party - Appellee: CARL F. JENKINS
Defendant - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Creditor: PLYMOUTH PARK SERVICES, LLC, d/b/a Xspand, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Inc., GRANITE TAX, LLC, GSRAN-Z, LLC and others
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Movant: PAULA M. COUTURE, in her capacity as Trustee of the 5 Regent Circle Realty Trust
Intervenor: BARTON BRUCE
v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak
as 1:2015cv00454
Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Global NAPs, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.
as 15-1959
Plaintiff: PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC, AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD. and others
Interested Party - Appellee: CARL F. JENKINS
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant: AMTRAK
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Movant: PAULA M. COUTURE, in her capacity as Trustee of the 5 Regent Circle Realty Trust
Intervenor: BARTON BRUCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?