Cases 21 - 30 of 51
GRIFFIN v. MAINE STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2015cv00519
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY M GRIFFIN
Defendant:
MAINE STATE PRISON, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDALL LIBERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Wenham, MA, et al
as 15-2337
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
WENHAM, MA, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, JEREMY COFFEY, Member of the Zoning Board of Appeals - Town of Wenham, ANTHONY M. FEEHERRY, Member of the Zoning Board of Appeals - Town of Wenham and others
GRIFFIN v. WINTLE
as 1:2015cv00435
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY M GRIFFIN
Defendant:
JEREMY WINTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Town of Wenham et al
as 1:2015cv12912
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Miller
Defendant:
Town of Wenham , Jeremy Coffey, Anthony M. Feeherry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv11228
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
US v. Caramadre
as 15-1125
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH A. CARAMADRE
Interested Party:
ANTHONY M. TRAINI, MICHAEL J. LEPIZZERA, JR., AXA EQUITABLE and others
Benefield v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, et al
as 1:2014cv14222
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. Benefield
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc , Fresenius USA Inc. , Fresenius USA Manufacturing Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Gero, et al
as 14-1755
Plaintiff:
DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY M. BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD JONES
Defendant:
RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER GERO and CORRECTION OFFICER OPONASET
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS PAROLE BOARD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-9002
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
