Cases 21 - 30 of 101
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company III v. Perez-Remedios et al
as 3:2017cv01496
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company III
Defendant:
Maria Luisa Perez-Remedios, The Estate of Gaspar Roca Natali, Miguel Wayne Roca-Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Eddington v. Yeh et al
as 1:2016cv10845
Plaintiff:
Timothy Eddington
Defendant:
B Yeh, R. Barnett and K Shilling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons v. Grondolsky, et al
as 16-1433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEON LORENZO LYONS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY GRONDOLSKY, LINDA SANDERS, UNITED STATES and others
AL-HAJ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv12805
Plaintiff:
AHMED MOHAMMED AL-HAJ
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Jeff Grondolsky, CLINICAL DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv12090
Plaintiff:
Michael Barnett
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Fresenius Medical Care North America, Fresenius USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pavao v. United States of America et al
as 1:2015cv11114
Plaintiff:
Luis Pavao
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Medical Center Fort Devens, Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Batty et al v. Albertelli et al
as 1:2015cv10238
Plaintiff:
Paul Barnett, D. Scott Batty, Jr., Jean Batty and others
Defendant:
Ken Albertelli, Richard C. Grimes, David A. Provencher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv30216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings Inc et al
as 1:2014cv13886
Plaintiff:
John G Barnett, II
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc, Fresenius U.S.A., Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
