Cases 21 - 30 of 191
Arrington v. City of Boston, et al
as 23-1124
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DEWAYNE ARRINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
BOSTON, MA, HORACE COLEMAN, GREGORY LONG, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner of the Boston Police Department and others
MacDonald v. Cumberland County Sheriff, et al
as 23-1105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KINLEY MACDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STEVE FRENCH, Manager, Correctional Operations Maine Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv10050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MacDonald v. Cumberland County Sheriff, et al
as 23-1028
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KINLEY MACDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STEVE FRENCH, Manager, Correctional Operations Maine Department of Corrections and others
Fofana et al v. Duffy et al
as 4:2022cv40148
Plaintiff:
Felipe Paniagua and Brima Fofana
Defendant:
Officer Thomas B Duffy, City of Worcester, Michael J Hanlon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Hunter v. City of Lynn Massachusetts et al
as 1:2022cv11363
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Hunter
Defendant:
City of Lynn Massachusetts, Lynn Police Department, Michael Mageary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
