Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Harlow III et al v. Town of Kingston et al
as 1:2015cv12042
Plaintiff:
Courtland L. Harlow III , Daniel J. Harlow and Dorothy P. Harlow
Defendant:
Town of Kingston , Paul Armstrong , Maureen Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Hanna
as 14-2346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL M. JONES
Defendant:
NCO FINANCIAL SERVICES, ACTION COLLECTION AGENCY, CAPITAL ONE SERVICES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FREDERICK J. HANNA
Interested Party:
LINDSEY SHEPHARD
COBB v. USA
as 2:2014cv00393
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DANIEL COBB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cobb et al v. Liberty Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv13200
Plaintiff:
Robert Cobb and Elizabeth Cobb
Defendant:
Liberty Industries, Inc. and Unifirst Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Gero, et al
as 14-1755
Plaintiff:
DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY M. BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD JONES
Defendant:
RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER GERO and CORRECTION OFFICER OPONASET
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS PAROLE BOARD
Cobb III et al v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv11634
Plaintiff:
John Cobb III and Narcissus Williams
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius Medical Care North America, Fresenius USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cobb v. Fresenius USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv10964
Plaintiff:
Nathan Cobb
Defendant:
Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc., Fresenius USA Marketing Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Brown
as 13-2232
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK BROWN, a/k/a Kareem Brown, a/k/a Donneil Brown, a/k/a Mark Williams Brown, a/k/a Rasheed Olojo-Kosoko, a/k/a Mark Williams, a/k/a Darnell Cobb, a/k/a Terrell Marques Brown, a/k/a Eric Brown, a/k/a Coop
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
