Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Diaz v. Spencer et al
as 1:2013cv10994
Defendant:
L. Spencer, P.A Peper, Jr, C.A Mici and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cryer v. MA Department of Correction, et al
as 13-1331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK SINCERE CRYER
Defendant - Appellee:
MA DEPT. OF CORRECTION, HAROLD W. CLARKE, CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL and others
Defendant:
JAMES R. BENDER and RONALD T. DUVAL
Interested Party:
JOHN DIAZ
Cox v. Massachusetts Department of Correction, et.al.
as 1:2013cv10379
Plaintiff:
William Cox
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Correction, Harold W. Clarke, Luis S. Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Diaz v. Spencer et al
as 1:2012cv12154
Plaintiff:
Juan Diaz
Defendant:
Luis S. Spencer, Peter A Pepper. Jr, Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glawson v. Clarke et al
as 1:2012cv11162
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Glawson
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, James Bender, Ronald Duval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davenport v. Massachusetts Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv11013
Plaintiff:
Andrew A Davenport
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Corrections, Luis Spencer, Veronica Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Wells V. Massachusetts Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv11780
Plaintiff:
Sander D. Wells
Defendant:
Massachusetts Dept of Correction, Umass Correctional Health, Kathleen Dennehy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hofland v. LaHaye, et al
as 11-1785
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL B. HOFLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD LAHAYE, JR., JESSICA DANIELSON, MICHAEL LARRIVEE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
