Cases 21 - 30 of 292
Pena Garcia v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, et al
as 22-1728
Petitioner:
LUIS PENA GARCIA
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, CALZADILLA CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION and IMS INSURANCE COMPANY OF PUERTO RICO
Pena Real Estate Investments, LLC v. One Hardt, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv11544
Plaintiff:
Pena Real Estate Investments, LLC
Defendant:
One Hardt, LLC and Drimel A Reyes
Trustee:
Ashgemi Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
US v. Valdez-Baez
as 22-1592
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE LUIS VALDEZ-BAEZ, a/k/a Francisco Pena-Luperon, a/k/a Jesus Delgado-Sierra
US v. Valdez-Baez
as 22-1606
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE LUIS VALDEZ-BAEZ, a/k/a Francisco Pena-Luperon
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Nueci-Pena v. USA
as 3:2022cv01272
Petitioner:
Francisco Nueci-Pena
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pena-Estrada v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv01057
Plaintiff:
Jehiel Pea-Estrada and Jehiel Pena-Estrada
Defendant:
United States of America and Efrain Rivas
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781 Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pena v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
as 1:2021cv11780
Plaintiff:
Carolina Pena
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez-Rodriguez, et al v. Doctor's Associates, LLC
as 21-1776
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAGDA C. RODRIGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ and FELIX PENA-FERNANDEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
