Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Hopkins, et al v. City of Calais Police Departme, et al
as 15-1661
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD HOPKINS and JAMES HOPKINS
Defendant:
CITY OF CALAIS POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAVID RANDALL, Chief, DWAYNE MCLELLON, a/k/a Duane McLellon and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID CLARONI, Officer
Abdallah Omran v. US, et al
as 15-1248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMMED ABDALLAH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, BJORN R. LANGE, Assistant Federal Public Defender, in both his individual and official capacities, ANDREW R. SCHULMAN, CJA Attorney, in both his individual and official capacities and others
Castec Inc v. W.G. Services, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv10466
Plaintiff:
Castec Inc
Defendant:
W.G. Services, LLC and Jonathan Wise
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Abdallah Omran et al v. USA et al
as 1:2014cv00505
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Ahmed Hassan Abdallah Omran
Defendant:
Janet Ackerman, Stephen Bartlett, Craig Calaman and others
Notice Only:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HOPKINS et al v. CITY OF CALAIS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2013cv00229
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HOPKINS and JAMES HOPKINS
Defendant:
CITY OF CALAIS POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAVID RANDALL, DAVID CLARONI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
WISE BUSINESS FORMS INC v. HESKETT
as 2:2011cv00059
Plaintiff:
WISE BUSINESS FORMS INC
Defendant:
DANIEL HESKETT
Thirdparty_defendant:
MARC PICARDO and CHARLES E TEETS
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
DANIEL HESKETT
Counter_claimant:
DANIEL HESKETT
Counter_defendant:
WISE BUSINESS FORMS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
