Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv10822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Yang v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv10760
Plaintiff:
Fan Yang
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Alberto R. Gonzales, Emilio T. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Demidov v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv10723
Plaintiff:
Andrey Demidov
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Alberto R. Gonzales, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Louis v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv00134
Petitioner:
Phillip J. Louis
Respondent:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1421 (c) Review of Denial of Naturalization Application
Jorgji, et al v. Gonzales
as 07-1571
Petitioner:
DIMITRULLA JORGJI, PANDELI JORGJI and ANGJELLO JORGJI
Respondent:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES
Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates,Inc. et al v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv10668
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Robert Mueller, III, Alberto R. Gonzales and others
Plaintiff:
Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates,Inc., Muzaffar Kamal SYED, Aaila Muzaffar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Zheng, et al v. Gonzales
as 07-1568
Petitioner:
YEN ZHENG ZHENG
Respondent:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General
Batiz-Morales et al v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2007cv01288
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Batiz-Morales and Jose Miguel Munoz-Batiz
Defendant:
United States Of America, Alberto R. Gonzales, Department of the Army and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chen et al v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv10635
Plaintiff:
Weibin Chen, Yanping Sun and Z. Chen
Defendant:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
