Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Aquinnah/Gay Head Cmty. Ass'n, et al v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head, et al
as 19-1729
3Rd Party Defendant: MAURA T. HEALEY, in her capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, CATHY M. JUDD-STEIN, in her capacity as Chair of the Massachusetts Gaming Commission and CHARLES D. BAKER, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Plaintiff: COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Defendant / Appellee: WAMPANOAG TRIBAL COUNCIL OF GAY HEAD, INC., WAMPANOAG TRIBE OF GAY HEAD (AQUINNAH) and AQUINNAH WAMPANOAG GAMING CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellant: AQUINNAH/GAY HEAD COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. and AQUINNAH, MA
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1661
Defendant / Appellant: WAMPANOAG TRIBE OF GAY HEAD (AQUINNAH), AQUINNAH WAMPANOAG GAMING CORPORATION and WAMPANOAG TRIBAL COUNCIL OF GAY HEAD, INC.
3Rd Party Defendant: MAURA T. HEALEY, in her capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, CHARLES D. BAKER, in his official capacity as Governor, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, STEPHEN P. CROSBY, in his capacity as Chairman of the Massachusetts Gaming Commission and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: AQUINNAH/GAY HEAD COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC., COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and AQUINNAH, MA
Doe v. Baker
as 19-1527
Respondent / Appellee: CHARLES D. BAKER
Petitioner: JANE DOE, C.W. /Imprisoned Somewhere
Petitioner / Appellant: JANE DOE, S.W.
Worman, et al v. Healey, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-1545
Defendant: MASSACHUSETTS STATE POLICE and CHARLES D. BAKER, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Amicus Curiae: ROYCE BARONDES, GREATER BOSTON INTERFAITH ORGANIZATION, MASSACHUSETTS CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID SETH WORMAN, ANTHONY LINDEN, JASON WILLIAM SAWYER and others
Defendant / Appellee: RICHARD D. MCKEON, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Massachusetts State Police, MAURA T. HEALEY, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, KERRY GILPIN, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Massachusetts State Police and others
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS ANDREW FELD
Estep v. Baker, et al
as 19-1211
Defendant / Appellee: TINA HURLEY, INA HOWARD-HOGAN, PAUL MICHAEL TRESELER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: THOMAS R. ESTEP
Liviz v. Baker, et al
as 19-1224
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL L. PARSON, Governor, DAVID IGE, Governor, JAY ROBERT PRITZKER, Governor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ILYA LIVIZ, SR.
Rosie D., et al v. Baker, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1262
Defendant / Appellant: CHARLES D. BAKER, MICHAEL HEFFERNAN, Secretary of the Executive Office of Administration and Finance, DANIEL TSAI, in his Official Capacity as the Assistant Secretary for MassHealth and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: TERRENCE M., ANTON B., by his mother Lisa A., SAMUEL L. and others
Defendant: JANICE B., ERIC KRISS and EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Undetermined: KRISTIN H.
Interested Party: MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE and ROBERT H. WEBER
L., et al v. Baker, et al
as 19-1126
Defendant / Appellee: MARYLOU SUDDERS, KAREN E. SPILKA, RALPH D. GANTS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: UELOT L., CHLOE L., KATIE L. and others
Defendant: JOY FLOWERS CONTI
Plaintiff: FABRIZIA L.
Clervrain v. Baker
as 1:2019cv10371
Defendant: Charles D. Baker
Plaintiff: Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyman et al v. Baker et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv10327
Plaintiff: Richard J Lyman , William F Weld and Robert D Capodilupo
Defendant: Charles D Baker and William Francis Galvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Type: Civil Rights Voting

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?