Cases 31 - 40 of 495
CITIMORTGAGE INC v. COOPER et al
as 1:2019cv00437
Defendant:
DAVID W COOPER, CARRIE L COOPER, DAVID COOPER and others
Plaintiff:
CITIMORTGAGE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Scott
as 19-1506
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVID SCOTT
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
SALEM FIVE CENT SAVINGS BANK and CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
In Re: Scott
as 19-1701
Respondent:
UNITED STATES, CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and SALEM FIVE CENT SAVINGS BANK
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DAVID SCOTT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 19-1434
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
The Washington Trust Company v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00068
Plaintiff:
The Washington Trust Company
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
US v. Cardona-Vazquez
as 19-1203
Interested Party:
MABEL MERCADO-LOPEZ, MARIA-DE-LOURDES MARQUES-GARCIA, ABNLLYS VAZQUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DIEGO CARDONA-VAZQUEZ
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
In Re: Scott
as 19-1160
Respondent:
UNITED STATES, CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and SALEM FIVE CENT SAVINGS BANK
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DAVID SCOTT
Sharpe, Jr. v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 1:2018cv12455
Plaintiff:
Elbert M. Sharpe, Jr. and FIA Card Services, N.A.
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Elbert M Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Perez-Nieves et al
as 3:2018cv01766
Plaintiff:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Defendant:
Marilu Nieves-Matos and Luis Manuel Perez-Nieves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Alvarado-Mercado et al
as 3:2018cv01810
Plaintiff:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Defendant:
Conjugal Partnership Alvarado-Caraballo, Jey Vladimir Alvarado-Mercado, Yamilette Caraballo-Rosario and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
