Cases 31 - 40 of 91
HARRIS v. LIBERTY et al
as 1:2019cv00346
Defendant:
TERRY SCOTT DRAKE, JOSHUA BLACK, JOE MANNING and others
Plaintiff:
DARIEN HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. AMAZON.COM INC et al
as 1:2019cv00255
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 and AMAZON.COM INC
Plaintiff:
HILLARY WHITE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
POROZ v. MONSANTO COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv00077
Plaintiff:
NATALA POROZ
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-50 and MONSANTO COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KITCHIN et al v. LIBERTY et al
as 1:2018cv00356
Defendant:
KENNEBEC COUNTY, GEORGE M JABAR, II, KENNEBEC COUNTY CORRECTIONS DIVISION and others
Plaintiff:
DANA B KITCHIN and DANIELLE KITCHIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAGGETT v. YORK COUNTY et al
as 2:2018cv00303
Defendant:
TOWN OF BERWICK, JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DAGGETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERNIER v. LINA MEDICAL USA INC et al
as 2:2017cv00332
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH D BERNIER
Defendant:
LINA MEDICAL USA INC, LINA MEDICAL APS, LINA MEDICAL POLSKA SP ZOO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCGARR v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 1:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
DARLENE MCGARR
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP, PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THIABAULT v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv00085
Plaintiff:
NORBERT THIABAULT
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, RANDALL LIBERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEY v. CITY OF AUGUSTA et al
as 1:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
RAISHAWN KEY
Defendant:
CITY OF AUGUSTA, ROBERTA FOGG, WILLIAM BRIDGEO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY MAINE et al
as 2:2015cv00505
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO PEREZ
Defendant:
ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY MAINE , ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY MAINE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT , CARSON CARVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
