Cases 31 - 40 of 96
ADAMS v. LANDRY et al
as 2:2017cv00357
Plaintiff:
JON ROBERT ADAMS
Defendant:
SCOTT R LANDRY, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, SCOTT MCCAFFERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gleis v. Advocates, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv11093
Plaintiff:
Nancy Gleis
Defendant:
Advocates, LLC, Amit Granot M.D., Amy Lopes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AMATUCCI v. CHASE et al
as 2:2017cv00157
Plaintiff:
JOSEPHINE AMATUCCI
Defendant:
STUART CHASE, ROB HOUSEMAN, SHANE EMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Taal v. St. Mary's Bank, et al
as 17-1228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BABOUCAR B. TAAL
Defendant - Appellee:
ST. MARY'S BANK, RONALD COVEY, GREGORY T. ULIASZ, Esq. and others
Interested Party:
JAY M. NIEDERMAN, W. MICHAEL SCANLON, RITA EMERSON LAMONT and others
Blake v. Commonwealth of MA, et al
as 16-2279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMERSON BLAKE
Defendant - Appellee:
ANNIE DOOKHAN and JULIE NASSIF
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, CHARLES SALEMI and LINDA HAN
Amatucci v. O'Brien et al
as 1:2015cv00356
Plaintiff:
Josephine Amatucci
Defendant:
Stuart Chase, Greg Dube, Shane Emerson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Taal v. St. Mary's Bank et al
as 1:2016cv00231
Defendant:
Gillian Abramson, Ronald Covey, St. Mary's Bank and others
Movant:
Rita Emerson Lamont, Kathleen Marquis, Jay M. Niederman and others
Plaintiff:
Baboucar Taal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv10998
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv10998
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CRAVALHO v. BURNHEIMER et al
as 2:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CRAVALHO
Defendant:
SCOTT BURNHEIMER , JEFFREY MERRILL , SHAWN EMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
