Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Gonzalez-Rivera v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
as 10-1605
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLOS LUIS GONZALEZ-RIVERA
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO
Respondent:
EDGARDO COLOMBA-RIVERA
Gonzalez-Rivera v. Matias, et al
as 10-1375
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLOS LUIS GONZALEZ-RIVERA
Respondent - Appellee:
JUDITH MATIAS and ROBERTO SANCHEZ-RAMOS
Interested Party:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO
Alvarez-De-Juan v. Alcaraz et al
as 3:2010cv01233
Plaintiff:
Ana Enid Alvarez-De-Juan
Defendant:
Osvaldo Alcaraz-Diaz, Pilar A. Cabrera-Rodriguez, Ana Rivera-De-la-Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
USA(Farms Service Agency) v. Gonzalez de Jesus et al
as 3:2010cv01160
Plaintiff:
USA(Farms Service Agency)
Defendant:
Luis Gonzalez de Jesus, Ernestina Hernandez-Serrano and Gonzalez de Jesus-He Conjugal-Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Rodriguez et al v. Toledo et al
as 3:2010cv01155
Plaintiff:
Adelaida Rodriguez, Ochlandra Rodriguez, Cruz M Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Pedro Toledo, Pedro Figueroa-Gonzalez, Alejandro Marquez-Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gonzalez-Colon v. USA
as 3:2009cv02120
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Luis Gonzalez-Colon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Perez-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2009cv01922
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Perez-Rodriguez, Cruz M Rodriguez and Ochlandra Rodriguez
Defendant:
Pedro Toledo, Pedro Figueroa-Gonzalez, Alejandro Marquez-Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Gonzalez-Bermudez vs. USA, et al
as 3:2008cv01456
Plaintiff:
Angel Luis Gonzalez-Bermudez
Defendant:
USA and US Postal Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
