Cases 31 - 40 of 175
Santos v. Divris
as 4:2022cv40149
Petitioner:
Joshua Santos
Respondent:
Superintendent Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frazier v. Alves
as 1:2022cv11967
Petitioner:
Antonio R. Frazier
Respondent:
Superintendent Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valle v. Kelly
as 3:2022cv30153
Petitioner:
Ramon Valle
Respondent:
Superintendent Sheila Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lucero v. Glynos et al
as 1:2022cv11823
Plaintiff:
Manuel Robert Lucero, V.
Defendant:
George Glynos, Ashley Turcotte, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Concepcion v. Alves et al
as 1:2022cv11703
Petitioner:
Raymond Concepcion
Respondent:
Superintendent Nelson Alves and Attorney General Maura Healey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Louis et al
as 1:2022cv11648
Plaintiff:
Daniel Louis and Superintendent Sheila Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gumkowski v. Kelly
as 1:2022cv11650
Plaintiff:
Matthew Gumkowski
Defendant:
Superintendent Sheila Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ferreira v. Alves
as 1:2022cv11352
Petitioner:
Antonio M. Ferreira
Respondent:
Superintendent Nelson B Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Alves
as 1:2022cv11147
Petitioner:
Cornelius Brown
Respondent:
Superintendent Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
West v. Alves
as 1:2022cv11044
Petitioner:
Steven West
Respondent:
Superintendent Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
