Cases 31 - 40 of 270
Wright et al v. Massachusetts Department of Public Health et al
as 3:2022cv11936
Plaintiff:
Johnny Kula and Robert Wright
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Public Health and Margret R. Cooke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wright et al v. Liberty Mutual Group, Inc.
as 1:2022cv11687
Plaintiff:
Bryan Wright and Alana Fadely
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DAVIS et al v. THERIAULT et al
as 1:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
HAROLD JOHN DAVIS, JR and CRAIG WORSTER
Defendant:
JANET THERIAULT, STEVEN GOLIEB, MICHAEL MADORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1557
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jeannite v. Wright et al
as 1:2022cv11060
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
Wright, Layden 2187, John Doe 1904 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Amatucci v. Wolfeboro, NH, Town of et al
as 1:2022fp00073
Plaintiff:
Josephine Amatucci
Defendant:
Wolfeboro, NH, Town of, Dean Rondeau, Steve Champaign and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv12091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv12093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
