Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Tottenham v. DeMoura et al
as 1:2021cv11531
Plaintiff:
Matthew P. Tottenham
Defendant:
Douglas A. DeMoura, Sergeant Lodico, John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Gladu
as 21-1639
Petitioner:
In re: NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Not Classified By Court:
ROBERT J. CARROLL, RYAN LANE and JACOB ZERNICKI
Respondent:
ZACHARY SWAIN, ANTHONY J. HARDY, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Noone v. Carpenter et al
as 1:2021cv10959
Defendant:
Christopher C Kinzer, Charlotte C Ferro, WellPath and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Noone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWAIN et al v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv00449
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CARROLL, ZACHARY SWAIN, ANTHONY HARDY and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Defendant:
MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, AMANDA SEIRUP, ANTHONY CANTILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nesbitt v. Wellpath
as 1:2020cv12126
Defendant:
Wellpath
Plaintiff:
Ralph Nesbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AVERY v. WELLPATH LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00428
Defendant:
WELLPATH LLC, MITCHELL HERRICK, DOUGLAS HEDGPATH and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE AVERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. WELLPATH OF MAINE et al
as 2:2020cv00424
Defendant:
YVONNE PEABBLES, WELLPATH OF MAINE, FREDA ESTEY and others
Plaintiff:
JON ROBERT ADAMS
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cullinan v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
as 1:2020cv11466
Defendant:
Wellpath, Massachusetts Department of Correction, David Duarte and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan P Cullinan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miranda v. Flores et al
as 1:2019cv12029
Defendant:
Massachusetts Partnership for Correctional Healthcare, Maria Angeles, M.D., Carlos Flores and others
Plaintiff:
Christian Miranda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
