Cases 41 - 50 of 126
Loestrin 24 FE Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2013md02472
Plaintiff:
Fraternal Order of Police Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, HEB Grocery Company L.P., Rite-Aid Corporation and others
Defendant:
Warner Chilcott Holdings Company III, Ltd., Warner Chilcott Sales (US), LLC, Warner Chilcott Company, LLC and others
Interested Party:
Health Care Service Corporation, Caremark, LLC, CVS Health Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Town of Millis, MA v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv12156
Defendant:
Actavis Pharma, Inc., Allergan plc, Allergan Finance LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Town of Millis, MA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Municipality of Barceloneta v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2020cv01488
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Richard S. Sackler, Anda, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Municipality of Barceloneta
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Municipality of Cidra, Puerto Rico v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2020cv01290
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Richard S. Sackler, Anda, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Municipality of Cidra, Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Municipality of Adjuntas, Puerto Rico v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2020cv01291
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Richard S. Sackler, Anda, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Municipality of Adjuntas, Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Ahold U.S.A., Inc. v. Warner Chilcott Public Limited, et al
as 19-8014
Petitioner:
WARNER CHILCOTT SALES (US), LLC, WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KROGER COMPANY, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE BENEFITS FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MARY ALEXANDER, a resident citizen of the State of North Carolina, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Interested Party:
BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC,, CAREMARK, LLC and CVS HEALTH CORPORATION
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, PLC, LUPIN LTD., WARNER CHILCOTT CORPORATION and others
Respondent:
AHOLD U.S.A., INC.
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, ASSOCIATION FOR ACCESSIBLE MEDICINES, PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA and others
Carroll County v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01097
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Frank Peter Boer, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carroll County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coos County et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01095
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Frank Peter Boer, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Doe Defendants 1 through 10 and coos county
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Providence, et al v. Warner Chilcott (US), LLC, et al
as 19-8026
Petitioner:
WARNER CHILCOTT SALES (US), LLC, WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
KROGER COMPANY, MARY ALEXANDER, a resident citizen of the State of North Carolina, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, WALGREEN CO. and others
Respondent:
ELECTRICAL WORKERS 242 & 294 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 35 HEALTH CARE FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Interested Party:
BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC,, CAREMARK, LLC and CVS HEALTH CORPORATION
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, PLC, WARNER CHILCOTT HOLDINGS COMPANY III, LTD., LUPIN LTD. and others
Municipality of Caguas v. Purdue Pharma Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01814
Defendant:
McKESSON CORPORATION, RICHARD S. SACKLER, ANDA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MUNICIPALITY OF CAGUAS, PUERTO RICO and Municipality of Caguas
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
