Cases 41 - 50 of 155
ERROR-NOT USED
as 3:2017cv01339
Plaintiff:
Edward Alberto Abinader, Laura Mercedes Gomez, Belgica Maritza Dominguez de Gomez and others
Defendant:
America Cruise Ferries Inc, Baja Ferries USA LLC, ABC and XYZ Marine Companies and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
De La Cruz v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as 1:2017cv10372
Plaintiff:
Lori De La Cruz
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS MEMBER CASE-LEAD CASE IS NOW CIVIL NO. 16-2529(DRD)
as 3:2017cv01059
Plaintiff:
Alexis Martinez de la Cruz , Branly Alcadio Nunez-Gomez , Baquel Ascencio-Rojas and others
Defendant:
America Cruise Ferries, Inc., Baja Ferries, S.A. de C.V., Insurance Company A and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arias Quiros v. Catholic Church of Puerto Rico, et al
as 17-1045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HECTOR JOSE ARIAS QUIROS
Defendant - Appellee:
CATHOLIC CHURCH OF PUERTO RICO, RAFAEL TORRES-ORTEGA, IGLESIA CABALLERO DE LA CRUZ and others
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company IV v. De La Cruz-Conner
as 3:2016cv03153
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company IV
Defendant:
Mercedes Miriam De La Cruz-Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ross de-la Cruz v. USA
as 3:2016cv03008
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Luis Ross de-la Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. De-La-Cruz-Gutierrez
as 16-2350
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
ADOLFO JAVIER DE-LA-CRUZ-GUTIERREZ
De La Cruz-Peguero v. USA
as 3:2016cv02689
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Randolfo De La Cruz-Peguero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. Marte-De La Cruz
as 16-2152
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
SANTOS MARTE-DE LA CRUZ, a/k/a Martes-De La Cruz
De La Cruz v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv11858
Plaintiff:
Luis De La Cruz
Defendant:
United States of America , Loretta Lynch , Jeffrey Grondolsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
