Cases 41 - 50 of 298
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Jones v. Hillman et al
as 1:2021cv11704
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Judge Timothy S. Hillman, Judge Sidney Hanlon and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv30102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Massachusetts Correction Officers Federated Union (MCOFU) et al v. Mici et al
as 4:2021cv11599
Plaintiff:
Massachusetts Correction Officers Federated Union (MCOFU), Michael Mosher, Zac Gustafson and others
Defendant:
Carol A. Mici and CHARLES D BAKER
Amicus Curiae:
Prisoners' Legal Services, Dr. Yonatan Grad, Dr. Monik C. Jimnez and others
Analog Technologies, Inc. et al v. Analog Devices, Inc.
as 1:2021cv11334
Plaintiff:
Analog Technologies, Inc. and Dr. Gang Liu
Defendant:
Analog Devices, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv30085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Krua v. Price, Ph.D et al
as 1:2021cv11061
Plaintiff:
Torli H. Krua
Defendant:
Dr Emmett G Price, Ph.D, III, United States Congress, United States Department of State and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Roman v. Lahey et al
as 4:2021cv40052
Plaintiff:
Angel Roman
Defendant:
Dr. Phillip Lahey, Jr., Worcester County Orthopedics, LLP and Jane/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Violette v. Fandryer et al
as 4:2021cv40050
Defendant:
Radm S. Spaulding, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Dr. Fandryer and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Paul Violette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
