Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Fowlkes v. Dennehy, et al
as 09-1057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELIPE OTEZE FOWLKES
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN M. DENNEHY, Commissioner, JAMES R. BENDER, Assistant Deputy Commissioner, TIMOTHY HALL, Assistant Deputy Commissioner and others
Sparks et al v. Dennehy et al
as 1:2008cv11437
Plaintiff:
Craig Sparks, Michael Freeman, Robert Lavoie and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Dennehy, Harold Clarke, Peter St. Amand and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fletcher v. Marshall
as 1:2008cv11392
Plaintiff:
Dennis Fletcher
Respondent:
John Marshall
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
King v. Veglas et al
as 1:2008cv11191
Plaintiff:
Kurt King
Defendant:
Beverly Veglas, Peter St. Armand, John Marshal and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bargoot v. Marshall et al
as 1:2008cv10726
Plaintiff:
Eric R. Bargoot
Defendant:
John Marshall, J. Lanpher, Joe Garretson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PRISON LEGAL NEWS v. Clarke et al
as 1:2008cv10677
Plaintiff:
PRISON LEGAL NEWS and PRISON LEGAL NEWS
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, James Bender, John Marshall, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Diaz v. Marshall et al
as 1:2008cv10453
Plaintiff:
Johnny Diaz
Defendant:
John Marshall, Peter St. Amand, Lampher and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cosenza v. Dennehy et al
as 1:2008cv10245
Plaintiff:
Natale Cosenza
Defendant:
Kathleen M. Dennehy, James Bender, John Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fowlkes v. Dennehy et al
as 1:2007cv12009
Plaintiff:
Felipe Oteze Fowlkes
Defendant:
Kathleen M. Dennehy, James R. Bender, Timothy Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrade v. Marshall et al
as 1:2007cv11078
Plaintiff:
Norberto Andrade
Defendant:
John Marshall and Keith Germain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
