Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Tinkham v. Perry, et al
as 13-1795
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER F. TINKHAM and JULIET B. ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
LAURA PERRY, ALAN PERRY, ESQUIRE, NINA PERRY, ESQUIRE and others
Nina v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems et al
as 1:2013cv00369
Plaintiff:
Hector R. Nina
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Barba et al v. Lee et al
as 1:2012mc00044
Defendant:
BR Consulting, Inc., CGI, Inc., Dahn Yoga & Health Centers, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Barba, Lily Christian, Heather Cleary and others
Tinkham, et al v. Perry, et al
as 12-2081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER F. TINKHAM and JULIET B. ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
LAURA PERRY, ALAN PERRY, Esquire, NINA PERRY, Esquire and others
TINKHAM et al v. PERRY et al
as 1:2012cv00229
Plaintiff:
PETER TINKHAM and JULIET B ALEXANDER
Defendant:
LAURA PERRY , ALAN PERRY , NINA PERRY and others
Counter_claimant:
LAURA PERRY and NINA PERRY
Counter_defendant:
JULIET B ALEXANDER and PETER TINKHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tinkham et al v. Perry et al
as 1:2012cv10893
Plaintiff:
Peter Tinkham and Juliet B. Alexander
Defendant:
Laura Perry, Alan Perry, Nina Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv40005
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WALLACE v. HANCOCK COUNTY et al
as 1:2010cv00511
Plaintiff:
NINA D WALLACE
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY, DIANA HENRY, APRIL HATCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nina
as 1:2010cv12024
Plaintiff:
Rafaela Nina
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
