Cases 41 - 50 of 152
Crocco v. Cheshire County Department of Corrections, Superintendent et al
as 1:2019cv00882
Plaintiff:
Joseph Crocco
Defendant:
Michael Oulette, McKim Mitchell, James Erwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson-Puritan Site OU2 Remedial Action Group v. Brown et al
as 1:2019cv00444
Defendant:
Pamela J Diehl and Victoria L Brown
Plaintiff:
Peterson-Puritan Site OU2 Remedial Action Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Peterson v. Fish & Friends, LLC., et al
as 1:2019cv11780
Defendant:
Fish & Friends, LLC., and Helen H Offshore Fishing Corp.
Plaintiff:
Nichole Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterson v. M/V ANGLER
as 1:2019cv11782
Defendant:
M/V ANGLER
Plaintiff:
Nichole Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Peterson et al v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
as 1:2019cv11412
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
James A. Peterson and Guinivere J. Ficara Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterson et al v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
as 4:2019cv11412
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
James A. Peterson and Guinivere J. Ficara Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11254
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Peterson v. Plymouth Sea Tours, LLC
as 1:2019cv11190
Plaintiff:
Nichole Peterson
Defendant:
Plymouth Sea Tours, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterson v. Binnacle Capital Services LLC
as 19-1420
Defendant / Appellant:
BINNACLE CAPITAL SERVICES LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANIS PETERSON
Defendant:
WIND GAP FARM SERVICES LLC
Peterson v. Burke et al
as 1:2018cv12572
Defendant:
The Democratic National Committee, Suzanne Barr, Mario E. Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Peterson and Pro Se Party Jeffrey Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
