Cases 41 - 50 of 178
Paye v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Acting Field Office Director et al
as 1:2019cv00635
Petitioner:
Samson Papay Paye
Respondent:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Acting Field Office Director and Strafford County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00394
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Larkin v. Strafford County Department of Corrections, Superintendent et al
as 1:2019cv00102
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Larkin
Defendant:
Strafford County Department of Corrections, Superintendent, Strafford County Department of Corrections, Assistant Superintendent of Security, Strafford County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00198
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00130
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00037
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01139
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01093
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00921
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Elwell et al v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2018fp00906
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Elwell
Defendant:
Strafford County Department of Corrections, Superintendent, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
