Cases 51 - 60 of 167
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Educational Amendments
In Re: Gladu
as 21-1959
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Respondent:
ANTHONY J. HARDY, ZACHARY SWAIN, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
SMITH v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00328
Plaintiff:
JAMES C SMITH, JR and JAYMIE DAVIS
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CAPTAIN LANE FELDMAN, SARGEANT GEORGE CARTER and others
Interested Party:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitfield et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00737
Plaintiff:
Helen Whitfield and Lane Whitfield
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Gladu
as 21-1639
Petitioner:
In re: NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Not Classified By Court:
ROBERT J. CARROLL, RYAN LANE and JACOB ZERNICKI
Respondent:
ZACHARY SWAIN, ANTHONY J. HARDY, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Varela v. Sandy Lane Auto, LLC
as 1:2021cv00212
Defendant:
Sandy Lane Auto, LLC doing business as Sandy Lane Auto Sales & Repair
Plaintiff:
Claudina Varela
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Pena et al v. Brentwood, M.D., et al
as 1:2020cv12304
Defendant:
CHERYL BRITTON, Patricia Lane, Dawn Bellorado and others
Plaintiff:
Yacaira Pena and Yadiel Isabel Pena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
SWAIN et al v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv00449
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CARROLL, ZACHARY SWAIN, ANTHONY HARDY and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Defendant:
MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, AMANDA SEIRUP, ANTHONY CANTILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Renkowicz v. Mici et al
as 3:2020cv30167
Defendant:
Officer Larson, Debra Moschos, Caran Lane and others
Plaintiff:
Donald P Renkowicz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
