Cases 51 - 60 of 351
Ruiz-Romero v. Colon-Santiago
as 3:2022cv01174
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Ruiz-Romero
Defendant:
Pablo Colon-Santiago
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01157
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Romero-Figueroa v. Gonzalez-Ramos et al
as 3:2022cv01131
Petitioner:
Celso Romero-Figueroa
Respondent:
Edwin O. Gonzalez-Ramos and Domingo Emanuelli-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aviles-Lugo et al v. Ruiz-Feliciano et al
as 3:2022cv01028
Plaintiff:
Pedro J. Aviles Lugo, Luis A. Aviles Ruiz, Mirna I. Caraballo Dasta and others
Defendant:
Wilfredo Ruiz Feliciano, Norbert Morales Carrero, Maribel Rodriguez Vera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ruiz-Romero v. Department of State of Puerto Rico
as 3:2021cv01630
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Ruiz-Romero
Defendant:
Department of State of Puerto Rico and Pontifical Catholic University of Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Del-Villar-Rosario v. Puerto Rico Department of Justice et al
as 3:2021cv01554
Plaintiff:
Euripides Del-Villar-Rosario
Defendant:
Puerto Rico Department of Justice, Domingo Emanuelli, San Juan Municipality and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ruiz-Romero v. YMCA Ponce, Inc., et al
as 21-1933
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNESTO RUIZ-ROMERO
Defendant / Appellee:
YMCA PONCE, INC., a/k/a Ponce YMCA, Inc. and MARITZA CORREA-PEREZ, Resident Agent
Ruiz-Romero v. Department of Justice of PR
as 21-1905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNESTO RUIZ-ROMERO
Defendant / Appellee:
PR DEPT OF JUSTICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
