Cases 61 - 70 of 474
Peterson v. Burke, et al
as 20-1171
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID LOPEZ, PHOENIX NEWSPAPERS, INC., d/b/a Arizona Republic, LUIS BORBON HOLGUIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY PETERSON
Saad Maura, et al v. Scotiabank de Puerto Rico, et al
as 20-1114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMARIS TORRES-NUNEZ, EVELYN MORALEZ-SUAREZ, CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP BERRIOS-RIVERA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BANCO SANTANDER DE PUERTO RICO, FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
WMPRRE LLC and SUNWEST MORTGAGE COMPANY INC.
Padilla Flores v. Triple-S Vida, Inc.
as 3:2019cv02063
Defendant:
Triple-S Vida, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Francisco Padilla Flores and Francisco Padilla-Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Flores v. Orleans District Court
as 19-2082
Respondent / Appellee:
ORLEANS DISTRICT COURT, Clerk
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAWRENCE FLORES
Flores-Mercado v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv01959
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Carmen G Flores-Mercado and Carmen G. Flores-Mercado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
United States of America v. Reyes-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2019cv01949
Defendant:
Juan N. Reyes Rodriguez, Conjugal Partneship Composed by Juan N. Reyes Rodriguez and Carmela Flores Rivera, Carmela Flores Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America- Farm Service Agency and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Miranda v. Flores et al
as 1:2019cv12029
Defendant:
Massachusetts Partnership for Correctional Healthcare, Maria Angeles, M.D., Carlos Flores and others
Plaintiff:
Christian Miranda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Medina-Flores
as 19-1814
Defendant / Appellant:
JEAN CARLOS MEDINA-FLORES, a/k/a Yankee
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11764
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
