Cases 61 - 70 of 798
Negron v. Mici et al
as 1:2022cv12030
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Negron
Defendant:
Carol A. Mici, Nelson Alves and Jodi Hockert-Lotz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
B. et al v. Romero et al
as 1:2022cv11851
Plaintiff:
F. B. and G. G.
Defendant:
Melvis C. Romero, Massachusetts Department of Corrections, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
B. et al v. Romero et al
as 1:2022cv11849
Plaintiff:
F. B., G. G. and Kristie Ladouceur
Defendant:
Melvis C. Romero, Department of Corrections of Massachusetts, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Yarde v. Mici et al
as 1:2022cv11395
Plaintiff:
David Yarde
Defendant:
Carol A. Mici, Steven Kenneway, Nestor Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massachusetts Correction Officers Federated Union, et al v. Mici, et al
as 22-1747
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MA CORRECTION OFFICERS FEDERATED UNION, (MCOFU) and MICHAEL MOSHER
Plaintiff:
ZAC GUSTAFSON, DENINA DUNN and ANGELA PUCCI
Defendant / Appellee:
CAROL A. MICI, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Correction and CHARLES DUANE BAKER, JR., in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Interested Party:
PRISONERS' LEGAL SERVICES, DR. YONATHAN GRAD, DR. MONIK C. JIMENEZ and others
Tottenham v. Tsinteris et al
as 1:2022cv11520
Plaintiff:
Ryan Tottenham
Defendant:
Pamala Tsinteris, Sharif Nankoe, Douglas Demoura and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Towne v. Gardner et al
as 1:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Brenda Towne
Defendant:
William Gardner, David Scanlan, Harri Hursti and others
Bell v. Trentzch et al
as 3:2022cv30102
Plaintiff:
Sharon-Shawn A. Bell
Defendant:
Johnathan Trentzch, Jeffrey Hartman, Lt. Rosay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
