Cases 71 - 80 of 202
Jones v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 1:2016cv11666
Plaintiff:
Edward T. Jones
Defendant:
Daniel Bennett, Department of Correction, Executive Office of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2016cv10878
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Bennett
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BENNETT v. USA
as 1:2016cv00251
Petitioner:
GEORGE BENNETT
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rumph v. Bennett et al
as 1:2016cv00162
Defendant:
Candice Bennett and Justin Bennett
Plaintiff:
Stephen Rumph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Intellitech Corporation v. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers et al
as 1:2016cv00009
Defendant:
Kathryn Bennett, IEEE Industry Standards and Technology Organization, Inc., Erik Jan Marinissen and others
Plaintiff:
Intellitech Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Tuitt v. Spencer, et al
as 15-2507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL TUITT
Defendant - Appellee:
LUIS S. SPENCER, in his Official Capacity as the Commissioner of the Department of Corrections, MARK A. CUTLER, individually and in his Official Capacity as a Correctional Officer for the Department of Corrections, ERIC SOLOMON, individually and in his Official Capacity as a Correctional Officer for the Department of Corrections and others
Genesis HR Solutions, Inc. v. Bennett et al
as 1:2015cv13982
Plaintiff:
Genesis HR Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Kirt Bennett and Dean Johnson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
RANKIN et al v. HALL et al
as 2:2015cv00480
Plaintiff:
MARK RANKIN and KELLY BENNETT
Defendant:
DAVID HALL, ANDREW FEENEY and UNKNOWN SHERIFF'S OFFICERS AND/OR OFFICIALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
