Cases 71 - 80 of 81
Garbino v. Saul et al
as 1:2019cv11382
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Garbino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Matthews v. Saul
as 1:2019cv11346
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Matthews
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Joyce v. Saul
as 1:2019cv11281
Plaintiff:
Erin H Joyce
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill and Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Mercado v. Berryhill et al
as 1:2019cv11172
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew M. Saul
Not Yet Classified:
U.S. Attorney Massachusetts and Attorney General USA
Plaintiff:
Santiago Rosario Mercado
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Henderson v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv11012
Plaintiff:
Keely Rae Henderson
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill and SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Martignetti et al v. City of Cambridge
as 1:2018cv10980
Plaintiff:
Victor A. Martignetti , David G. Albert , Keith Albert and others
Defendant:
City of Cambridge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2015mc91357
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
Andrew M. Porter
ProTecs, LLC v. Slee et al
as 1:2010cv11922
Plaintiff:
ProTecs, LLC
Defendant:
Andrew M. Slee and Steve Saraceni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cuevas v. Klyman et al
as 3:2008cv30141
Plaintiff:
Felix Luis Cuevas
Defendant:
Andrew M. Klyman, Edward C. Bryant, Jr., James A. Couture and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America v. Swarm
as 1:2007cv12062
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Andrew M. Swarm and Andrew M. Swarm
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4248 (a) Commitment of Sexually Dangerous Person
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
